Thursday, May 26, 2011


The other day, I was trolling Facebook, and I saw an article my friend posted about a dog, Coffee, who sits outside of Yankees and Mets games holding a pipe or wearing a Groucho Marx disguise and panhandling.  The article was about how people think that Coffee is being abused.  Of course, this put me on alert, so I read on.  I then went to the Facebook page "Stop Abusing Coffee."  The people on the page stated that Coffee wore an e-collar, and was forced to sit outside for long periods of time with no food or water.  They also claimed she had no teeth, and they said that all these factors pointed to extreme abuse.  The people called to have the man arrested.  After the ASPCA investigated and found no signs of abuse, they turned against the ASPCA.  They insulted Jay Leno after he made a brief comment about the situation, and they insulted Nick Cannon because he agreed with the ASPCA.

Frankly, I'm more than a little annoyed and quite disgusted by all these people.  So, let me address each issue.

The E-collar
The e-collar is a training tool.  Cody wears an e-collar on a regular basis.  I put it on him so he can walk next to me off leash and come when called.  I call it my safety blanket, because I know it will keep my baby safe.  He wears that collar WHENEVER he is off-leash, but I rarely have to the nick (shock) function, and I often use the simple vibrate function just to get his attention.  Whenever his collar comes out, he gets excited because he knows we are going somewhere fun.  Putting and e-collar on Coffee does not equal abuse. 

That said, an e-collar can be used improperly, and I have not seen/met Coffee or her owner, so I don't know how they're using it.  All I know is that the fact she's wearing one does not point to any signs of abuse.

No Water
Of course, forcing a dog to sit for hours on end with no water available could be considered abuse...sort of.  When I'm out with Cody, or when we're at an event, I do not often have a bowl of water for him.  Rather, I keep an eye out for his needs.  Does he seem thirsty or tired?  Is it particularly hot?  On more than one occasion, I have taken water in my mouth and put it back in his (particularly on long car rides) just to wet his mouth.  Also, there are lots of doggie water bottles that do not require an owner to carry a bowl.  On top of that, Cody does not drink water 24/7.  He will often go hours without any water, and if a bowl were placed next to him, he almost certainly would not drink it if all he'd been doing was standing in one place.

It is Coffee's owner's responsibility to make sure she is not dehydrated.  Having a bowl of water out all the time would be easy, but it does not promote actually watching and observing your dog for signs of healthiness.

No Teeth
Many people are claiming that Coffee has no teeth, and indeed pictures of the dog's mouth do not show many (if any) teeth present.  However, while most are assuming that the owner removed the teeth so the dog could hold the pipe for long periods of time, I'm more apt to believe that this is how Coffee came, or that Coffee had bad teeth that HAD to be removed.  Coffee was a rescue dog.  I have seen lots of rescue dogs with terrible teeth.  Many had to have teeth removed.  As a pit found in a shelter, Coffee may have been a fighting dog.  If she had chewed on chains, bars, and other unsavory objects and not been given proper care, it is totally plausible that she simply wore her teeth down beyond repair.  If this is the case, then one could applaud Coffee's owner for feeding her foods she could eat and caring for a higher maintenance dog.

Dogs Shouldn't Have Jobs
This is one argument that makes me want to slap the people who say it.  The human-dog bond was created by dogs working for us.  ALL dogs need a job, especially higher-energy dogs like pits.  For some dogs, like Yorkies, the job is to chase rodents; Shih-tzus have the relaxing job of keeping laps and hands warm by sleeping on them; Labs work by retrieving; Pits were originally bred to work on farms.  ALL DOGS HAVE JOBS.  This one may be unorthodox, but it's a job none the less.

All in all, I think these people are overreacting.  They've contacted all sorts of sources, and those sources are all giving the same response: "There's no sign of abuse, but we're monitoring the situation."  Even PETA said this...PETA, the same people who insulted the president for killing a fly and who wanted Ben & Jerry's to start using human breast milk instead of cow's milk to make their ice cream because milking a cow was inhumane. 

It makes me ill to see how quickly people jump to reactions, and it makes it difficult as a trainer to see how some people treat other trainers.  Please, people, get over yourselves. 

Oh, and just to quickly address some other issues raised.  The bandanna is worn over the e-collar not because the owner knows the e-collar is wrong, but rather because he's sick of comments for ignorant people.  The Groucho Marx disguise that's worn does NOT cover the Coffee's nose.  She can breathe just fine.  Oh, and Coffee probably has had puppies, and she most likely bore them BEFORE she came into her current owner's home.  There, I hope you got the message!


  1. Yes, agreed! Dogs should not have any electric or technical collars on them. It gets me to think what people are thinking when they are doing things like that!

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. Dog Island, did you read my post?

  4. The abuse aspect comes from making the dog sit in the same position for long spans of time by shocking it when it tries to do something else i.e. lay down. It is not a direct attack on e-collars or letting dogs have jobs. I feel you have greatly misunderstood the whole concept. Yes, there are people on that facebook page who are ridiculous in their claims. Specifically the ones who want the guy arrested or are trying to steal the dog. I think the dog has a lovely home, but using an e-collar to make a dog pan handle is abuse in my opinion. He's not using an e-collar to train. He's using it to keep a dog sitting in one spot. That's not training. That's called learned helplessness. Hopefully, since you're a trainer, you'll know what that term means.

    The dog has teeth. I've said that numerous times on the facebook. Sure, there are people who refuse to believe that. But even if the dog didn't have teeth, why does that matter? The whole concept is on the specific time when the dog is at the game.

    I do agree with you on the food and water thing. That's one of my biggest pet peeves. People say that in addition to abuse claims. Um, hello, I don't let my dogs have 24/7 access to food because they'd constantly eat. And they don't have 24/7 access to water either. When we walk, they get their drinks at the end of the walk. I don't constantly hover a bowel of water in front of them because "it's abuse" for them not to have water all the time.

    I hope you understand the motive behind the stop abusing coffee campaign now. I tend to find that a lot of people who do use e-collars responsively tend to feel the need to justify e-collars whenever people point at them and shout abuse. One of the things you should know about e-collars is how easy they are to abuse and how often they are used in such a manner. Simply having an e-collar on a dog doesn't mean abuse. But having an e-collar on a dog in a public place and making the dog sit in one spot for long periods of time or else...well...that's abuse. You can not call that training. The ultimate goal of tools like the e-collar is to not have to use them. Shocking a dog for doing every little wrong thing isn't training it...again, it's learned helplessness. The dog doesn't learn what TO do, but rather figures out the hard way the infinite amount of things it can't do...lay down, walk, move, drop the pipe. etc.

    Also, the thing that upset me the most was the many outright denying using an e-collar. Yet he's pictured hold the remote to an e-collar. Sorry, but if you're using an e-collar correctly, you won't go to great lengths to hide what you're doing. If you believe what you're doing is right, you'll gladly speak of your ways, not try to hide it with a bandanna, deny it when photographic proof is given to you, and then try to pass off an ice collar as the alleged thing people are thinking is an e-collar. Last I checked, ice collars don't come with remote controls.

    Alright, I'll step off my soapbox lol. Just wanted to let you know that there are crazies in every bunch. Not everyone who supports the coffee campaign are loonies.

  5. Megan, I understood the motive from the beginning, but it quickly became distorted and was no longer about what it had started for.

    Like I said in my post, I have no idea how this guy is using the e-collar, and if he IS using it to keep Coffee in one position, then you're right. That's wrong. However, we can't prove that's what he's using it for. Most of these people were shouting abuse simply because Coffee was wearing one. Heck, half the time Cody wears one I don't use it, but it's still there. Just because she's wearing a certain collar doesn't mean anything.

    I never thought everyone who supported the Coffee campaign was a loser. I did, however, think it had gotten way out of control, and I obviously could not support it. Thank you for your opinion, though. I'm glad to know there are some sane people out there. :)

  6. air jordan shoes,
    nike air max,nike roshe,nike huarache
    rayban sunglasses,
    cyber monday,
    miami dolphins,
    ralph lauren,
    toms outlet,
    green bay packers,
    lebron 12,
    replica watches,
    nhl jerseys wholesale,
    nobis outlet,
    designer handbags,
    new york jets,
    michael kors outlet store,
    michael kors outlet online,
    mizuno running,
    louis vuitton outlet,louis vuitton outlet online,louis vuitton,,authentic louis vuitton,louis vuitton factory outlet,cheap louis vuitton
    ed hardy shoes,ed hardy,ed hardy clothing,ed hardy shoes for women,ed hardy clothing for men,ed hardy perfume,ed hardy watches
    karen millen dresses,
    kkk10 08